Thursday, April 9, 2009

How Stable Is North Korea?


Last Saturday North Korea launched an intercontinental ballistic missile. They claimed it was a satellite but that seems less then truthful considering nothing made it into orbit. Seeing that our President is too scared to do anything nothing will get accomplished. Think about it, if Russia and China would not increase sanctions on North Korea after Bush's appeal do you really think that President Hussein will have better results? Absolutely not. Its about time American citizens are fully aware of the threat posed by North Korea.

During the Cold War neither side preemptively launched nuclear weapons against the other side because of the rational conclusion that the world would be destroyed. The thing is, for rational decisions to be made we must have rational decision makers. Has anybody seen Kim Jung Il recently? The man looks like a walking vegetable. He can not move his arms and probably has lost control of many body functions. Can a man in this state really be trusted to make the rational choice to not launch nuclear weapons? We do not even know if he is still mentally there. Remember when Woodrow Wilson had a stroke nobody was told of the extent of his handicaps and will live in a country with a free press. Also, we have a Congress that can temporarily step in if the executive branch not functioning properly. The North Koreans do not have those options. What if Kim Jung Il goes crazy and orders nuclear weapons to be dropped on South Korea or Japan? Is there anybody who can oppose his decision. No there is not.

I think North Korea needs to be given an ultimatum. Keep your government but get rid of nuclear weapons or keep your nuclear weapons and reform your government. I highly doubt if the North Koreans had a functioning democracy or Republic we would ever need to worry about their nuclear weapons program. Rational voters will not elect representatives who want to see the end of the world.

Tuesday, April 7, 2009

America's First Anti-America President


Does anybody have a problem with President Hussein going to Europe and constantly insulting America? Personally, I am pissed. If he wants to trash America in Europe he should stay there. If he thinks Europeans like him because of his agenda he is greatly mistaken. Europeans like him because he is a weak leader and because he trashes America as much as Europeans do. Nobody respects him. Amongst the G20 members our President looked like the village idiot. He gave up everything and got nothing.

This man lives in an imaginary world. He has the absurd vision that one day man will lay down their arms and sing Kum Ba Ya around the international campfire. A 10 year old will tell you that something sounds wrong with that logic. We have a limited amount of time to secure our international dominance and for the first time ever our President is working against it. Obama has the false belief that inequalities are better addressed through legislation then the free markets. Please tell me what group of Americans have become prosperous through government legislation? The answer is none.

Thursday, April 2, 2009

The Obama Lies


I seem to remember a time long ago (during the campaign) when President Hussein (Obama) said he would not raise ANY tax on anybody making under $250,000. When every single true conservative and classical liberal told people Hussein was lying about his tax policy his little minions went out and shaded the truth. Modern liberals can not be trusted. They will say and do anything to get their agenda accomplished and trust me, their agenda is not what you think it is.

Now that Hussein has announced he will be raising taxes on anybody who smokes and anybody who uses energy I think the appropriate question to ask ourselves is who smokes and uses energy?

The far majority of smokers are lower to middle class people. Not the filthy rich. Does this mean our President is a liar? HELL YES!!!

What about people the people who will be most affected by government mandated higher gas prices. I seem to remember fuel shortages in Northern US cities. I also seem to remember that the ones mostly affected by these shortages were poor minorities. Another way to look at it is like this, are there any rich truck drivers, cab drivers, or delivery people? I doubt it.

What happened to his promise that 95% of Americans will not see tax increases? He is a liar. His whole leftist movement is one big cover up for a government takeover of the private sector and for a redefinition of our rights. This man is the most dangerous thing to ever happen to American democracy.

How dumb are people. He has lied about almost everything he promised during the campaign and still he has a 60% approval rating. Somebody needs to start the "Impeach Obama Movement." Maybe if we get him of office we can still counter his socialist agenda.

Friday, March 6, 2009

Dumbing Down America


Democrats must think Americans are the dumbest people on the face of the Earth. They refer to welfare checks as tax rebates, bailout of billionaires as stimulus, tax increases as new sources of revenue, weakening of the military as investing into the future, taking away private ballots and calling it Free Choice Act, and so on, and so forth. Are we really that dumb?

Why don't we call things what they are?
1) freedom of choice=loss of private ballot
2)tax rebate=welfare check
3)investments into the future=weakening the US military
4)stimulus=bailout for failures
5)new revenue=tax increases (on everyone)

I wonder what would happen if Obama said, "I want to raise the tax on all forms of energy," or "I will take away the constitutional right to a private ballot"? People would go crazy. the media would turn against him immediately for fear of ratings loss if seen as supporting an anti-American President.

PEOPLE JUST START PAYING ATTENTION. REAGAN SAID TRUST BUT VERIFY, I SAY DO NOT TRUST THEN CONFIRM.

Wednesday, March 4, 2009

The Real Republican Leader

I have a secret for you America. The real Republican leader is you. Its true. The only reason the party is even relevant is because you support certain fundamental issues. If a group exists without leadership then each member has taken it upon his or self to make sure their voices are heard. This is what true conservatism is. We do not need someone defining it for us, we know what it is. The only thing Republicans having for them is that they are on the right side (relative to Democrats) on most issues. Everything else is a disaster. they have no leadership, no momentum, no major supporters, no national growth, nothing. The fact that there are still some people who are rational and factual is the only beacon of light I see in the Republican future.

Rush Limbaugh is obviously not the Republican leader but then again neither is Michael Steele. Unfortunately, Steele is extremely irrelevant. Most people have no idea who he is. Steele has not even presented a clear vision for the party. I can think of a better platform.

The Republican Revolution

1. Institute Fair Tax (close IRS).
2. Complete reformation of earmark process.
3. Appeal to Hispanics through Christian brotherhood and fair immigration policy.
4. Change drug policy.
5. Private ballot for workers.
6. Choice in schools
7. Grant federal contracts and pay federal employees based on market value.
8. Extend free and fair trade to as many foreign nations as possible.
9. Respectable and honorable Social Security reform.
10. Strongest army in the world. Both offensive and defensive.

Wednesday, February 11, 2009

Obama Anounces We Will Follow a Different Path

"We will follow a different path!" This one phrase seems to sum up the whole Obama movement. Every speech Obama gives, every press conference he gives, every time he is seen by the American people the message is always the same. It is one that consists of two basic premises. On the one hand he claims that change is absolutely necessary and on the other hand he claims that this change will be unlike any other. The combination of these two ideas has led to a complete reversal of power in the highest positions of our government. But is this message really new?
In fact, it sounds eerily familiar. This has been the war cry for every Marxist movement most notably the Communist Revolution in Russia and Eastern Europe. These were Lenin's exact words. What we have emerging in this country is almost revolutionary. Within weeks the new administration and the left wing Congress have permanently altered the future of this great nation. This kind of reckless governance has social, economic, and political consequences.
People need to understand exactly what is happening. The decisions that are hastily being made as I type this will impact every single American for generations to come. Its simple. You can not spend so much money. If Utopian societies were sustainable every country would have embraced a communist like structure but at every corner this communist/Marxist idea fails.
Wake up people. Everything the previous generations have provided for us it being wiped away in a single stroke of a pen.

Tuesday, December 30, 2008

Peace Through War



I think the only way we can have peace in the middle east is if all the different terrorist threats are annihilated. These terrorist organizations are what destabilize governments and furthermore kill innocent civilians. For the most part I think the terrorist threat is Iraq is under control. I think within a couple years the terrorist threat in Afghanistan will be dealt with. Pakistan seems to be trying to fight the terrorists within its own borders. If Israel was allowed to fully topple Hezbollah there would not be a terrorist organization in Lebanon. Now Israel is fighting Hamas. If Hamas is permanently defeated then that's one less terrorist threat in the world. One by one these organizations need to be dismantled and the leadership needs to be held accountable for their actions. Until all of the world's terrorist organization all defeated we must accept the 1 to 1000 rule. For every single innocent person a terrorist organization kills the world ought vow to kill 1000 terrorists. Within several months the idea of joining a terrorist organization will seem so unrealistic that their membership will evaporate.

Monday, December 29, 2008

Biased Reporting

Is it me or does every article you read regarding the Israeli and Palestinian situation make Israel seem like they are only killing civilians. Who is writing these articles? American reporters are starting to embarrass me. It seems like they are just getting talking points from Al Jazeera. Do they not realize Israel is fighting terrorists? These terrorists hide weapons in people's house, in schools, and anywhere else there are civilians. Our reporters have completely stopped trying to find the truth. Every single article has a statement like "according to Mustopha Jabar (made up name), a Palestinian teacher, Israel has killed 11 children under the age of 15 and 7 women." What kind of crap is this? Does anybody realize that this teacher is probably lying? These liberal media is rotting the American culture from the inside out. These agenda driven journalists do not care about what the truth is, they just care about having a shock and awe article. It's like if you have two journalists and one is writing the truth and one is writing biased articles from the terrorists point of view, which article do you think will catch your eye first?

Sunday, December 28, 2008

Complete Defeat of Hamas

I am so sick of these Dark Age terrorists. Hamas needs to be defeated once and for all. They are not a government, they are a terrorist organization. Nobody feels sorry for Hamas. I hope those animals are getting what has been coming to them for a long time. No water, no electricity, no medicine, nothing. Let them rot. If you are in any way supporting these terrorists you ought to be treated as an enemy combatant. Israel can not allow its citizens to constantly be bombarded with rockets. They must send a message to Hamas and any other organization that wishes Israel harm. The defeat of Hamas will be a strong blow to terrorists around the world. Death to Hamas! Long live Israel!

Saturday, December 27, 2008

Israel's Right to Self Defense


Can you imagine what would happen if one missile came from Cuba and struck the United States of America? Would the American military be justified in retaliating? How far should America go in terms of retaliating? What should be the conditions of the cease fire?


First and foremost, if America got attacked by Cuba there would be an immediate retaliation. Americans would not care what the rest of the world had to say. In the words of John McCain "Americans don't live history, Americans make history". Can you imagine how the US population would respond if the government did nothing? There would be riots within hours in every major city. The government would have no choice but to act. Remember the President takes an oath to defend this country from enemies both foreign and abroad.


Next comes the question of justification. Would the US be justified in its retaliation to the attack? Of course we would. What is the point of having a great army if we don't retaliate against attacks on the homeland? If Cuba starts bombing us then we have the right to defend ourselves. Obviously some civilians would die (in any war this is known as collateral damage) but Cuba knew that when they initially bombed America. If your worried about civilians dieing don't start a war. Any country is justified to use military force when the safety of its citizens is threatened by another country's military.


How strong should the retaliation be? Just using common sense I would think the retaliation should be strong enough to serve two purposes. First, to let Cuba and the rest of the world know that even the thought of attacking America is so devastating to your home country that it is unthinkable and second, the retaliation needs to set Cuba so far back that they will not even have the opportunity to attack America for decades to come. If you just do a light bombing all your doing is pissing people off, but if you lay waste to the country the people will know that their government messed up when they attacked America.


Last but not least comes the conditions of the cease fire. There ought not be a cease fire until Cuba can no longer carry out attacks against the United States for decades to come. They will need to be taught a lesson about how to interact with the US. There is no point of declaring a cease fire if nothing has been solved. To solve the problem the American government would need to weed out every Cuban responsible for the attack and execute them. This will stop the attacks and at the same time send a message to not mess with America.


Now reread the article but instead of saying Cuba say Palestine and instead of saying America say Israel. Its the same thing. Let Israel defend itself. Let Israel do whatever is necessary to lay a foundation for future safety. If Israel does not exterminate the terrorist threat this time it will keep coming back for more.